Hi Thomas, I thought that the suggestion to add the original input lines was not bad. It would be even better if -fdump-tree-original could do that. I often time find myself putting a line under the spotlight in a contained subroutine.
Thanks for working on -fdump-parse-tree. Cheers Paul On 8 October 2017 at 13:57, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: > Hello world, > > I have committed a few small fixes for -fdump-fortran-original and > friends. > > Since there was interest on c.l.f from somebdoy who actually wanted to > use the dump for something useful, I have also clarified in the docs > that this is something that is not guaranteed to work between releases. > > Regards > > Thomas > > 2017-10-08 Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org> > > * dump_prase_tree (show_symbol): Output list of variables in > NAMELIST. > (show_code_node): Add new line for ELSE and END DO for DO > CONCURRENT. > * invoke.texi: Document that the output of > -fdump-fortran-original, -fdump-fortran-optimized and > -fdump-parse-tree is unsable and may lead to ICEs. -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
