On Thu, 2017-10-05 at 20:33 +0300, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > I'm currently bootstrapping the following patch (on aarch64-linux- > gnu, arm-linux-gnueabihf will follow tomorrow), which (like Wilco's > patch) seems to unbreak bootstrap, but is less invasive and preserves > handling of multi_mem_insns. Would please interested parties help me > test it? > > Comments?
This patch is not applying to my ToT. The code in autopref_rank_for_schedule doesn't seem to match what I have in my tree. Steve Ellcey
