Hi All, This patch adds a more elaborate self-test to the arm back-end which tests to make sure you don't have any bit specified in ISA_ALL_FPU_INTERNAL that are not defined by any fpu configuration.
Catching this during the self-test prevents an ICE at runtime when -mfpu=auto tries to detect the fpu to use. Regtested on arm-none-eabi and no issues. Ok for trunk? gcc/ 2017-10-05 Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> * config/arm/arm.c (arm_test_fpu_data): New. (arm_run_selftests): Call arm_test_fpu_data. --
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c index 4cddf3b02e5e731507c2d326b80747524fd505bf..ae7e76f8b0c38f74c8d6479ff0a209df8b97d5b4 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.c +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.c @@ -31393,10 +31393,43 @@ arm_test_cpu_arch_data (void) } } +/* Scan the static data tables generated by parsecpu.awk looking for + potential issues with the data. Here we check for consistency between the + fpu bits, in particular we check that ALL_FPU does not contain a feature bit + that is not defined by any FPU flag. */ +static void +arm_test_fpu_data (void) +{ + auto_sbitmap isa_all_fpubits (isa_num_bits); + auto_sbitmap fpubits (isa_num_bits); + auto_sbitmap tmpset (isa_num_bits); + + static const enum isa_feature fpu_bitlist[] + = { ISA_ALL_FPU_INTERNAL, isa_nobit }; + arm_initialize_isa (isa_all_fpubits, fpu_bitlist); + + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < TARGET_FPU_auto; i++) + { + arm_initialize_isa (fpubits, all_fpus[i].isa_bits); + bitmap_and_compl (tmpset, isa_all_fpubits, fpubits); + bitmap_clear (isa_all_fpubits); + bitmap_copy (isa_all_fpubits, tmpset); + } + + if (!bitmap_empty_p (isa_all_fpubits)) + { + fprintf (stderr, "Error: found feature bits in the ALL_FPU_INTERAL" + " group that are not defined by any FPU.\n" + " Check your arm-cpus.in.\n"); + ASSERT_TRUE (bitmap_empty_p (isa_all_fpubits)); + } +} + static void arm_run_selftests (void) { arm_test_cpu_arch_data (); + arm_test_fpu_data (); } } /* Namespace selftest. */