On 10/07/11 17:50, Mike Stump wrote:
On Oct 7, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:First, thanks so much for tackling this review. I don't think anyone's overly enthusiastic about reviewing dejagnu crap^H^H^H^Hcode.I'll review it. :-) The last version looks fine to me, watch out for failures.How do you like this approach?Ok.
Thank you. Tested on x86-64 Linux and committed.I will now adjust the cxx-memory-model branch accordingly and merge these changes into the branch.
Aldy
