extract_range_from_binary_expr_1 had: if (range_int_cst_p (&vr0) && range_int_cst_p (&vr1) && TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (expr_type)) ... ... extract_range_from_multiplicative_op_1 (vr, code, &vr0, &vr1);
but extract_range_from_multiplicative_op_1 also requires range_int_cst_p. I think we should bail out if either range isn't a constant. This might only be theoretical with current sources, but it's needed once polynomial constants are added. Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linus-gnu. OK to install? Richard 2017-09-20 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@linaro.org> Alan Hayward <alan.hayw...@arm.com> David Sherwood <david.sherw...@arm.com> gcc/ * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_binary_expr_1): Don't call extract_range_from_multiplicative_op_1 if !range_int_cst_p. Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c =================================================================== --- gcc/tree-vrp.c 2017-08-30 12:18:46.631541422 +0100 +++ gcc/tree-vrp.c 2017-09-20 13:04:20.397027078 +0100 @@ -2462,9 +2462,14 @@ extract_range_from_binary_expr_1 (value_ signop sign = TYPE_SIGN (expr_type); unsigned int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (expr_type); - if (range_int_cst_p (&vr0) - && range_int_cst_p (&vr1) - && TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (expr_type)) + if (!range_int_cst_p (&vr0) + || !range_int_cst_p (&vr1)) + { + set_value_range_to_varying (vr); + return; + } + + if (TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS (expr_type)) { typedef FIXED_WIDE_INT (WIDE_INT_MAX_PRECISION * 2) vrp_int; typedef generic_wide_int