I'm going to abuse either my *gimpl* maintainer hat or my obvious hat and approve this.
However, since we already have another test that looks the same (gimplefe-error-2.c) but without the 0 case, it would probably be best to add a comment in gimplefe-14.c as to why there is a 0 case. In the case of gimplefe-error-2.c, it doesn't matter because it is only a compile test. OK with that nit. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:44 AM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > Hello. > > Simple fix for args == 0 also returns 0 return value. > > Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests. > > Ready to be installed? > Martin > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2017-09-11 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> > > PR testsuite/82114 > * gcc.dg/gimplefe-14.c (main): Add handling of case 0. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/gimplefe-14.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >
