Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 09:18:33PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> writes: >> > Hi Richard, >> > >> > I'm afraid your patchset has broken bootstrap on i686-unknown-freebsd10.3, >> > in fact, it appears on FreeBSD in general (amd64-unknown-freebsd11 as >> > well): >> >> This sounds like the same as PR82045. Could you try the patch I posted >> here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg00062.html ? > > Richard, could you please next time commit such a huge series of patches > that has not been tested separately as one commit (or test the patches also > individually)? It is sometimes fine for patch review if the granularity is > smaller, but e.g. for bisection having long ranges of commits that don't > build/bootstrap at all is highly undesirable. That seems to be at least on > x86_64-linux the case of r251470 to r251503 inclusive. > > Thanks
Yeah, sorry about that. I had tested the original series as separate patches, but messed up when making a final tweak in the switch to using "require ()". I'd wanted to commit them separately precisely so that a bisect would identify a particular patch (this did help for PR82045). But obviously the mistake in expmed.c meant that quite a few revisions are duds. Thanks, Richard
