"Jon Beniston" <j...@beniston.com> writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> I think the issue is that with TARGET_VECTOR_MODE_SUPPORTED_P false
>> for V1SI you'll get a SImode vector type and the
>>
>> if (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (type_in)
>> || VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (type_in)))
>>
>>check fails. Try changing that to || VECTOR_TYPE_P (type_in).
>>The else path should be hopefully dead ...
>>
>>> It looks to me like the other call sites of optab_for_tree_code which
>>> are passing optab_default are mostly places where GCC is sure it is
>>> not a shift operation.
>>> Given TYPE_IN is returned from get_vectype_for_scalar_type, is it
>>> safe to simply pass optab_vector in vect_pattern_recog_1?
>>
>>I guess so. Can you also try the above?
>
> Changing VECTOR_MODE_P check into VECTOR_TYPE_P check also works for me, I
> verified the following patch could vectorize my dot product case and there
> is no regression on gcc tests on my port.
>
> Meanwhile x86-64 bootstraps OK and no regression on gcc/g++ test.
>
> Does this look OK?
>
>
> gcc/
> 2017-08-30 Jon Beniston <j...@beniston.com>
> Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
> index cfdb72c..5ebeac2 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
> @@ -4150,7 +4150,7 @@ vect_pattern_recog_1 (vect_recog_func *recog_func,
> loop_vinfo = STMT_VINFO_LOOP_VINFO (stmt_info);
>
> if (VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (type_in)
> - || VECTOR_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (type_in)))
> + || VECTOR_TYPE_P (type_in))
> {
> /* No need to check target support (already checked by the pattern
> recognition function). */
It looks like this makes the VECTOR_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P (type_in) check redundant.
Thanks,
Richard
