Bill Seurer pointed out to me that when I checked in the PR 82015 patches, I
had changed the error message, but I didn't update the test. I checked this
patch in as obvious:
2017-08-30 Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/82015
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr82015.c: Fix up error message.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr82015.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr82015.c (revision 251538)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr82015.c (working copy)
@@ -5,10 +5,10 @@
unsigned long foo_11(vector __int128_t *p)
{
- return __builtin_unpack_vector_int128(*p, 11); /* { dg-error "argument 2
must be 0 or 1" } */
+ return __builtin_unpack_vector_int128(*p, 11); /* { dg-error "argument 2
must be a 1-bit unsigned literal" } */
}
unsigned long foo_n(vector __int128_t *p, unsigned long n)
{
- return __builtin_unpack_vector_int128(*p, n); /* { dg-error "argument
2 must be 0 or 1" } */
+ return __builtin_unpack_vector_int128(*p, n); /* { dg-error "argument
2 must be a 1-bit unsigned literal" } */
}
--
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA
email: meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
