On 2017-04-25 09:30 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 04/14/2017 06:44 PM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > On 2017-04-14 15:00 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > > On 2017-04-13 09:05 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > > > > Did you verify LTO bootstrap still works with the patch? > > > > > > I've just done a LTO bootstrapp (boarding a train :) ). > > > It works with my patch. > > > > I've done dejagnu tests in lto.exp and built a Linux kernel > > with lto bootstrapped GCC. They seem good. > > Given Richi's general agreement around the in_lto_p, let's go with the > patch on the trunk only. > > If you get positive feedback from Jan, then this can be backported to > gcc-7 after it's been on the trunk for at least a week.
We have 15 weeks now :) Re-tested on gcc-7-branch with lto-bootstrap. No regressions. Is it OK to backport this to gcc-7-branch? -- Xi Ruoyao <r...@stu.xidian.edu.cn> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
