On 10/06/2011 06:37 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 10/06/11 01:47, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> This appears to be because the split prologue contains a jump, which >> means the find_many_sub_blocks call reorders the block numbers, and our >> indices into bb_flags are off. > > Testing of the patch completed - ok? Regardless of split-stack it seems > like a cleanup and eliminates a potential source of errors.
Yes, patch is ok. r~