On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > I've bootstrapped/regtested the following patch last night and committed > after preapproval from Nathan, though of course a question is if > lookup_fnfields_slot/lookup_fnfields_slot_nolazy shouldn't have > if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (type)) return NULL_TREE; or > gcc_assert (!CLASS_TYPE_P (type)); > readded to the beginning of those functions.
It seems that we already ICE if we call it with a non-class type, so adding an assert would just document that behavior? Jason
