On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This PR points out that m_elt_size was left uninitialized in the member
> initializer list for base_pool_allocator. I think it makes sense to
> initialize
> it like this.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok.
Richard.
> 2017-08-02 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
>
> PR other/81667
> * alloc-pool.h (base_pool_allocator): Initialize m_elt_size.
>
> diff --git gcc/alloc-pool.h gcc/alloc-pool.h
> index a5236db3dae..1d04e5d2cfe 100644
> --- gcc/alloc-pool.h
> +++ gcc/alloc-pool.h
> @@ -240,8 +240,9 @@ base_pool_allocator
> <TBlockAllocator>::base_pool_allocator (
> const char *name, size_t size MEM_STAT_DECL):
> m_name (name), m_id (0), m_elts_per_block (0), m_returned_free_list (NULL),
> m_virgin_free_list (NULL), m_virgin_elts_remaining (0), m_elts_allocated
> (0),
> - m_elts_free (0), m_blocks_allocated (0), m_block_list (NULL), m_size
> (size),
> - m_initialized (false), m_location (ALLOC_POOL_ORIGIN, false PASS_MEM_STAT)
> {}
> + m_elts_free (0), m_blocks_allocated (0), m_block_list (NULL), m_elt_size
> (0),
> + m_size (size), m_initialized (false),
> + m_location (ALLOC_POOL_ORIGIN, false PASS_MEM_STAT) {}
>
> /* Initialize a pool allocator. */
>
>
> Marek
