>> If you have a cute idea how to elegantly introduce warnings into this >> mechanism, I'm all ears. > I'm not sure that it qualifies as cute, but we could produce multi-line > diagnostics in the same way c++ does (for template candidates for example), > like: > error/warning: #the error/warning > note: in actual argument at <> # the context
Maybe not the worst idea. The question is, how would we do this technically? Can it be handled with the existing infrastructure (gfc_error_... )? Alternatives might be: * simply throw the warning without context * have 'check_dummy_characteristics' not return SUCCESS/FAILURE, but something like SUCCESS/WARNING/ERROR and then react on this appropriately by throwing either an error or a warning (more tedious) Cheers, Janus
