On 06/11/2017 08:03 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 30 May 2017, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> On 05/30/2017 09:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >>> This leaves the nvptx and c6x ports without a maintainer. Do >>> you have any recommendations for a successor here? >> Not really. It would be a shame to lose the C6X port though. If I'm >> CC'd on any bug reports I'm prepared to keep it working - if that's >> considered sufficient, I can readd myself as maintainer. > > I think that would be preferrable. Even if practically it may > not make a huge difference, people with less background/involvement > will know who to contact, and having an entire port without maintainer > just doesn't feel right.
I've done that now. Bernd
Index: MAINTAINERS =================================================================== --- MAINTAINERS (revision 249919) +++ MAINTAINERS (working copy) @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ arm port Richard Earnshaw <richard.earn arm port Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com> avr port Denis Chertykov <cherty...@gmail.com> bfin port Jie Zhang <jzhang...@gmail.com> +c6x port Bernd Schmidt <bernds_...@t-online.de> cris port Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@axis.com> epiphany port Joern Rennecke <g...@amylaar.uk> fr30 port Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com> Index: ChangeLog =================================================================== --- ChangeLog (revision 249919) +++ ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2017-07-03 Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> + + * MAINTAINERS: Readd myself for c6x. + 2017-06-28 Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz> PR bootstrap/81217
