Hi All, Sorry I just realized I never actually sent the updated patch...
So here it is :) Regards, Tamar ________________________________________ From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org <gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org> on behalf of Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:51:52 PM To: Richard Sandiford Cc: GCC Patches; nd; James Greenhalgh; Richard Earnshaw; Marcus Shawcroft Subject: RE: [PATCH][GCC][AARCH64]Bad code-gen for structure/block/unaligned memory access > > + /* Optimize routines for MEM to REG copies. */ if (n < 8 && > > + !REG_P (XEXP (operands[0], 0))) > > This seems to be checking that the address of the original destination > memory isn't a plain base register. Why's it important to reject that case > but > allow e.g. base+offset? this function is (as far as I could tell) only being called with two types of destinations: a location on the stack or a plain register. When the destination is a register such as with void Fun3(struct struct3 foo3) { L3 = foo3; } You run into the issue you had pointed to below where we might write too much. Ideally the constraint I would like is to check if the destination is either a new register (no data) or that the structure was padded. I couldn't figure out how to do this and the gains over the existing code for this case was quite small. So I just disallowed it leaving it to the existing code, which isn't so bad, only 1 extra instruction. > > > + { > > + unsigned int max_align = UINTVAL (operands[2]); > > + max_align = n < max_align ? max_align : n; > > Might be misunderstanding, but isn't max_align always equal to n here, since > n was set by: Correct, previously this patch was made to allow n < 16. These were left over from the cleanup. I'll correct. > > > + result = gen_rtx_IOR (dest_mode, reg, result); > > + } > > + > > + dst = adjust_address (dst, dest_mode, 0); > > + emit_insn (gen_move_insn (dst, result)); > > dest_mode was chosen by smallest_mode_for_size, so can be bigger than n. > Doesn't that mean that we'll write beyond the end of the copy region when > n is an awkward number? Yes, see my answer above. For the other case, when we write onto a location on the stack, this is fine due to the alignment. > > > diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c > > index > > > 91d7ea217229fac62380b5d4b646961bf7c836c1..b1df4651e7942346007cda1cce > 8e > > e5a19297ab16 100644 > > --- a/gcc/expr.c > > +++ b/gcc/expr.c > > @@ -2743,7 +2743,9 @@ copy_blkmode_to_reg (machine_mode mode, > tree > > src) > > > > n_regs = (bytes + UNITS_PER_WORD - 1) / UNITS_PER_WORD; > > dst_words = XALLOCAVEC (rtx, n_regs); > > - bitsize = MIN (TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (src)), BITS_PER_WORD); > > + bitsize = BITS_PER_WORD; > > + if (SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (BLKmode, TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE > (src)))) > > + bitsize = MIN (TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (src)), BITS_PER_WORD); > > I think this ought to be testing word_mode instead of BLKmode. > (Testing BLKmode doesn't really make sense in general, because the mode > doesn't have a meaningful alignment.) Ah, yes that makes sense. I'll update the patch. New patch is validating and will submit it soon. > > Thanks, > Richard
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c index ab1bdc0233afe7a3c41501cb724a5c4c719123b8..1cf6c4b891571745f740d7dbd03754bbba9264a6 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c @@ -13466,7 +13466,6 @@ aarch64_copy_one_block_and_progress_pointers (rtx *src, rtx *dst, /* Expand movmem, as if from a __builtin_memcpy. Return true if we succeed, otherwise return false. */ - bool aarch64_expand_movmem (rtx *operands) { @@ -13498,16 +13497,55 @@ aarch64_expand_movmem (rtx *operands) base = copy_to_mode_reg (Pmode, XEXP (src, 0)); src = adjust_automodify_address (src, VOIDmode, base, 0); + /* Optimize routines for MEM to REG copies. + This particular function only handles copying to two + destination types: 1) a regular register and 2) the stack. + When writing to a regular register we may end up writting too much in cases + where the register already contains a live value or when no data padding is + happening so we disallow it. */ + if (n < 8 && !REG_P (XEXP (operands[0], 0))) + { + machine_mode mov_mode, dest_mode + = smallest_mode_for_size (n * BITS_PER_UNIT, MODE_INT); + rtx result = gen_reg_rtx (dest_mode); + emit_insn (gen_move_insn (result, GEN_INT (0))); + + unsigned int shift_cnt = 0; + for (; n > shift_cnt; shift_cnt += GET_MODE_SIZE (mov_mode)) + { + int nearest = 0; + /* Find the mode to use. */ + for (unsigned max = 1; max <= (n - shift_cnt); max *= 2) + nearest = max; + + mov_mode = smallest_mode_for_size (nearest * BITS_PER_UNIT, MODE_INT); + rtx reg = gen_reg_rtx (mov_mode); + + src = adjust_address (src, mov_mode, 0); + emit_insn (gen_move_insn (reg, src)); + src = aarch64_progress_pointer (src); + + reg = gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND (dest_mode, reg); + reg = gen_rtx_ASHIFT (dest_mode, reg, + GEN_INT (shift_cnt * BITS_PER_UNIT)); + result = gen_rtx_IOR (dest_mode, reg, result); + } + + dst = adjust_address (dst, dest_mode, 0); + emit_insn (gen_move_insn (dst, result)); + return true; + } + /* Simple cases. Copy 0-3 bytes, as (if applicable) a 2-byte, then a 1-byte chunk. */ if (n < 4) { if (n >= 2) - { - aarch64_copy_one_block_and_progress_pointers (&src, &dst, HImode); - n -= 2; - } + { + aarch64_copy_one_block_and_progress_pointers (&src, &dst, HImode); + n -= 2; + } if (n == 1) aarch64_copy_one_block_and_progress_pointers (&src, &dst, QImode); diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c index 2d8868e52cefdfdc2d81135811cbf1cb3e6ff82b..7eca579e769acb131bd0db344815e344fdc948f2 100644 --- a/gcc/expr.c +++ b/gcc/expr.c @@ -2743,7 +2743,9 @@ copy_blkmode_to_reg (machine_mode mode, tree src) n_regs = (bytes + UNITS_PER_WORD - 1) / UNITS_PER_WORD; dst_words = XALLOCAVEC (rtx, n_regs); - bitsize = MIN (TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (src)), BITS_PER_WORD); + bitsize = BITS_PER_WORD; + if (SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (word_mode, TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (src)))) + bitsize = MIN (TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (src)), BITS_PER_WORD); /* Copy the structure BITSIZE bits at a time. */ for (bitpos = 0, xbitpos = padding_correction;