Re: [C++ PATCH] conversion operator names

[Nathan Sidwell]

On 06/30/2017 03:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:

We used to give conversion operatos type-specific mangled names.  Now we
just number them 'operator $N' for N in [1,...].  As such
mangle_convop_name_for_type is misnamed and has no place in mangle.c

Hmm, wouldn't actual mangling make more sense, so that it's consistent
between compilations?

While that would work, I have a different and simpler plan in mind.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell