Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied. Richard.
2017-06-26 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> PR tree-optimization/81203 * tree-tailcall.c (find_tail_calls): Do not move stmts into non-dominating BBs. * gcc.dg/torture/pr81203.c: New testcase. Index: gcc/tree-tailcall.c =================================================================== --- gcc/tree-tailcall.c (revision 249638) +++ gcc/tree-tailcall.c (working copy) @@ -573,6 +573,11 @@ find_tail_calls (basic_block bb, struct { if (! tail_recursion) return; + /* Do not deal with checking dominance, the real fix is to + do path isolation for the transform phase anyway, removing + the need to compute the accumulators with new stmts. */ + if (abb != bb) + return; for (unsigned opno = 1; opno < gimple_num_ops (stmt); ++opno) { tree op = gimple_op (stmt, opno); Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr81203.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr81203.c (nonexistent) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr81203.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ + +int a; +int b() +{ + int c, d; + if (a) + d = b(); + return 1 + c + d; +}