Hi Dominique,
> Is it OK to commit the following patch (darwin only)?
this patch needs a ChangeLog entry (and preferably a description of the
problem you're fixing ;-)
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pubtypes-2.c 2017-06-17
> 17:55:51.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pubtypes-2.c 2017-06-25 18:01:52.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /* { dg-options "-O0 -gdwarf-2 -dA" } */
> /* { dg-skip-if "Unmatchable assembly" { mmix-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "__debug_pubtypes" } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "long+\[ \t\]+0x13b+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+Pub Info Length" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "long+\[ \t\]+0x125\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+Pub Info Length" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "used_struct\\\\0\"+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+external name" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "unused_struct\\\\0\"+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+external name" } } */
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pubtypes-3.c 2017-06-17
> 17:55:52.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pubtypes-3.c 2017-06-25 18:03:38.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /* { dg-options "-O0 -gdwarf-2 -dA" } */
> /* { dg-skip-if "Unmatchable assembly" { mmix-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "__debug_pubtypes" } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "long+\[ \t\]+0x13b+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+Pub Info Length" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "long+\[ \t\]+0x125\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+Pub Info Length" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "used_struct\\\\0\"+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+external name" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "unused_struct\\\\0\"+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+external name" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\"list_name_type\\\\0\"+\[
> \t\]+\[#;]+\[ \t\]+external name" } } */
> --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pubtypes-4.c 2017-06-17
> 17:55:51.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pubtypes-4.c 2017-06-25 18:04:38.000000000 +0200
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> /* { dg-options "-O0 -gdwarf-2 -dA" } */
> /* { dg-skip-if "Unmatchable assembly" { mmix-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "__debug_pubtypes" } } */
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "long+\[ \t\]+0x172+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+Pub Info Length" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "long+\[ \t\]+0x15c\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+Pub Info Length" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "used_struct\\\\0\"+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+external name" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "unused_struct\\\\0\"+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+external name" } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\"list_name_type\\\\0\"+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[
> \t\]+external name" } } */
Why not got for
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "long+\[ \t\]+0x\[0-9a-f]+\[ \t\]+\[#;]+\[ \t\]+P
ub Info Length" } } */
i.e. not checking for a specific length, as gcc.dg/pubtypes-1.c already
does?
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
