On 05/17/2017 12:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:45 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <h...@bitrange.com> wrote: > >>> But yes, we definitely should document the final canonical ordering. >> >> Is that about to also happen? >> >> I foresee in another half-a-dozen years, and *this* iteration is >> forgotten, someone bothered enough to argue eloquently coming >> around, doing rtl-level-maintenance, maybe a new pass (ok maybe >> not a *new RTL-pass* :) sees that order as wrong for the reason >> listed above, and does the legwork to switch the order around. >> It will be ok to change it again then, because the order just >> happened this time because of minimal-edit-reasons, right? >> Noone can argue that it was a thoughtful deliberate change that >> we bothered to document, to stay consistent? ;) > > The proposed doc patch is wiating for review at [1]. > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01073.html OK for the trunk.
Sorry for the delay, jeff
