This fixes a bug discovered when we were evaluating the current state of
-fstack-check.  It ought to be able to go forward independent of the
rest of the -fstack-check work.

The aarch64 specific code does not correctly handle large frames and
will generate RTL with unrecognizable insns for such cases.  This is
clearly visible if -fstack-check is enabled by default or if it were to
be added to the torture flags in the testsuite.

I've tested this by bootstrapping and regression testing an aarch64
compiler with -fstack-check on by default and hacks to force all
allocations/probing of more than PROBE_INTERVAL bytes to go through this
path.  It fixes a slew of testsuite failures (~80 for C and a few for
Fortran and C++).


One example is c-torture/compile/20031023-1.c which has a local frame of
0x10000000000 bytes.

OK for the trunk?

Jeff




        * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_emit_probe_stack_range): Handle
        frame sizes that do not satisfy aarch64_uimm12_shift.

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index 04417dc..4f89457 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -2722,11 +2722,19 @@ aarch64_emit_probe_stack_range (HOST_WIDE_INT first, 
HOST_WIDE_INT size)
                     plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, -first));
 
       /* LAST_ADDR = SP + FIRST + ROUNDED_SIZE.  */
-      emit_set_insn (reg2,
-                    plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
-                                   -(first + rounded_size)));
-
-
+      HOST_WIDE_INT adjustment = - (first + rounded_size);
+      if (! aarch64_uimm12_shift (adjustment))
+       {
+         aarch64_internal_mov_immediate (reg2, GEN_INT (adjustment),
+                                         true, Pmode);
+         emit_set_insn (reg2, gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, reg2));
+       }
+      else
+       {
+         emit_set_insn (reg2,
+                        plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, adjustment));
+       }
+               
       /* Step 3: the loop
 
         do

Reply via email to