On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> Martin's recent patch that introduced sanitize_flags_p causes us to
> instrument operations even when current_function_decl is NULL.  If it
> is valid constant expression it will be folded away soon, otherwise
> usually we emit a runtime initializer in the static ctors function for
> it.  In any case, neither gimple_add_tmp_var that create_tmp_var calls
> normark_addressable actually work in that case, fixed thusly,
> bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux plus
> bootstrapped/regtested with bootstrap-ubsan, ok for trunk?

Ok.

Richard.

> 2017-06-19  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR sanitizer/81111
>       * ubsan.c (ubsan_encode_value): If current_function_decl is NULL,
>       use create_tmp_var_raw instead of create_tmp_var, mark it addressable
>       just by setting TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the result and use a TARGET_EXPR.
> 
>       * g++.dg/ubsan/pr81111.C: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/ubsan.c.jj    2017-06-16 13:27:48.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/ubsan.c       2017-06-16 16:28:29.099155949 +0200
> @@ -145,9 +145,17 @@ ubsan_encode_value (tree t, bool in_expa
>       {
>         /* The reason for this is that we don't want to pessimize
>            code by making vars unnecessarily addressable.  */
> -       tree var = create_tmp_var (type);
> -       tree tem = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, void_type_node, var, t);
> -       mark_addressable (var);
> +       tree var;
> +       if (current_function_decl)
> +         {
> +           var = create_tmp_var (type);
> +           mark_addressable (var);
> +         }
> +       else
> +         {
> +           var = create_tmp_var_raw (type);
> +           TREE_ADDRESSABLE (var) = 1;
> +         }
>         if (in_expand_p)
>           {
>             rtx mem
> @@ -158,8 +166,17 @@ ubsan_encode_value (tree t, bool in_expa
>             expand_assignment (var, t, false);
>             return build_fold_addr_expr (var);
>           }
> -       t = build_fold_addr_expr (var);
> -       return build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (t), tem, t);
> +       if (current_function_decl)
> +         {
> +           tree tem = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, void_type_node, var, t);
> +           t = build_fold_addr_expr (var);
> +           return build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (t), tem, t);
> +         }
> +       else
> +         {
> +           var = build4 (TARGET_EXPR, type, var, t, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE);
> +           return build_fold_addr_expr (var);
> +         }
>       }
>        else
>       return build_fold_addr_expr (t);
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr81111.C.jj   2017-06-16 15:39:57.752886010 
> +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ubsan/pr81111.C      2017-06-16 15:39:37.000000000 
> +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> +// PR sanitizer/81111
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +// { dg-options "-fsanitize=shift" }
> +
> +template <typename V>
> +struct N
> +{
> +  static const V m = (((V)(-1) < 0)
> +                   ? (V)1 << (sizeof(V) * __CHAR_BIT__ - ((V)(-1) < 0))
> +                   : (V) 0);
> +};
> +
> +template<typename V>
> +const V N<V>::m;
> +
> +template <typename V>
> +struct O
> +{
> +  static const V m = (V)1 << sizeof(V) * __CHAR_BIT__;
> +};
> +
> +template<typename V>
> +const V O<V>::m;
> +
> +void
> +foo ()
> +{
> +  N<long long>::m;
> +  N<unsigned long long>::m;
> +#ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__
> +  N<__int128>::m;
> +  N<unsigned __int128>::m;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar ()
> +{
> +  O<long long>::m;
> +  O<unsigned long long>::m;
> +#ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__
> +  O<__int128>::m;
> +  O<unsigned __int128>::m;
> +#endif
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to