On Mon, 5 Sep 2011, David Miller wrote:
>> Should we use GNU/Linux in those three cases per the standing request
>> from RMS? I can make the change if so.
> I'm completely ambivalent, feel free to make the change.
Okay, so I went ahead (with some delay, ahem) and applied the patch
below.
Thanks,
Gerald
2011-10-02 Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com>
* invoke.texi (SPARC Options): Refer to GNU/Linux.
Index: doc/invoke.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/invoke.texi (revision 179433)
+++ doc/invoke.texi (working copy)
@@ -17345,7 +17345,7 @@
@samp{ultrasparc3}, @samp{niagara}, @samp{niagara2}, @samp{niagara3},
and @samp{niagara4}.
-Native Solaris and Linux toolchains also support the value @samp{native},
+Native Solaris and GNU/Linux toolchains also support the value @samp{native},
which selects the best architecture option for the host processor.
@option{-mcpu=native} has no effect if GCC does not recognize
the processor.
@@ -17418,7 +17418,7 @@
@samp{supersparc}, @samp{hypersparc}, @samp{leon}, @samp{f930}, @samp{f934},
@samp{sparclite86x}, @samp{tsc701}, @samp{ultrasparc}, @samp{ultrasparc3},
@samp{niagara}, @samp{niagara2}, @samp{niagara3} and @samp{niagara4}. With
-native Solaris and Linux toolchains, @samp{native} can also be used.
+native Solaris and GNU/Linux toolchains, @samp{native} can also be used.
@item -mv8plus
@itemx -mno-v8plus
