On 06/02/2017 09:38 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi Martin,
After r247444, I saw the following two regressions in
arm-linux-gnueabihf environment:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c (test for warnings,
line 119)
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c (test for warnings,
line 121)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c (test for warnings,
line 121)
The warning message related to those two lines are:
testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c:119:3: warning:
'%9223372036854775808i' directive width out of range [-Wformat-overflow=]
testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c:121:3: warning:
'%.9223372036854775808i' directive precision out of range
[-Wformat-overflow=]
testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c:121:3: warning:
'%.9223372036854775808i' directive precision out of range
[-Wformat-overflow=]
Did you notice similar things from your test environment, Christophe?
Looks like you're missing a couple of warnings. I see the following
output with both my arm-linux-gnueabihf cross compiler and my native
x86_64 GCC, both in 32-bit and 64-bit modes, as expected by the test,
so I don't see the same issue in my environment.
/ssd/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c:119:3:
warning: ‘%9223372036854775808i’ directive width out of range
[-Wformat-overflow=]
T ("%9223372036854775808i", 0); /* { dg-warning "width out of
range" } */
^
/ssd/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c:119:3:
warning: ‘%9223372036854775808i’ directive output of 9223372036854775807
bytes causes result to exceed ‘INT_MAX’ [-Wformat-overflow=]
/ssd/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c:121:3:
warning: ‘%.9223372036854775808i’ directive precision out of range
[-Wformat-overflow=]
T ("%.9223372036854775808i", 0); /* { dg-warning "precision out of
range" } */
^
/ssd/src/gcc/git/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-18.c:121:3:
warning: ‘%.9223372036854775808i’ directive output of
9223372036854775807 bytes causes result to exceed ‘INT_MAX’
[-Wformat-overflow=]
Martin
