Hello,
thanks for proofreading!
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 01:35:56PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Just some very minor nits.
>
> > Index: final.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- final.c (revision 248684)
> > +++ final.c (working copy)
> > @@ -1951,9 +1951,11 @@ dump_basic_block_info (FILE *file, rtx_i
> > fprintf (file, "%s BLOCK %d", ASM_COMMENT_START, bb->index);
> > if (bb->frequency)
> > fprintf (file, " freq:%d", bb->frequency);
> > - if (bb->count)
> > - fprintf (file, " count:%" PRId64,
> > - bb->count);
> > + if (bb->count.initialized_p ())
> > + {
> > + fprintf (file, " count");
>
> Missing colon.
> s/count"/count:"/
Fixed!
>
> I think i saw a_count = a_count + something above and assumed you didn't
> have a += operator. Could thus use the terse form in the snipped code
> above on the patch, maybe?
I did conversion without those operators first because all those places
are subject to updating WRT uninitialized values. I will re-add in
place operators incrementally.
> > static bool
> > check_counter (gimple *stmt, const char * name,
> > - gcov_type *count, gcov_type *all, gcov_type bb_count)
> > + gcov_type *count, gcov_type *all, profile_count bb_count_d)
> > {
> > + gcov_type bb_count = bb_count_d.to_gcov_type ();
> > + return true;
>
> On purpose?
No, it was a hack. I have dropped it now.
I will commit the patch after bit of additional testing. Note that it breaks
gcc.dg/tree-prof/section-attr-2.c because it uncovers bug in loop-im which
forgets to update profile (thus we end up with uninitialized counts rahter than
0 now and prevent hot/cold splitting). I will submit fixes incrementally
one by one rather than mixing them with the actual reorg.
Honza
