Hi, I have recently updated the dejagnu version I use for cross-testing arm and aarch64 toolchains to 1.6+. One of the side effects was mentioned by Jonathan in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg01267.html. Since I use multilibs to test many configurations, I noticed several changes in the results I get.
In particular, on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf with -march=armv5t, all the tests that require arm_neon_ok fail to compile because they now use -march=armv5t -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -march=armv7-a, which leads to a failure to include gnu/stubs-soft.h (not present since the target is 'hf'). Previously, -march=armv5t was appended, making the tests unsupported because -mfpu=neon conflicts with -march=armv5t. Now, arm_neon_ok succeeds because it only checks if some preprocessor defines are present. This patch fixes that by including arm_neon.h in arm_neon_ok, such that it fails for unsupported cases. However, since most of these tests should pass instead of becoming unsupported, I have added flag combinations with -mfloat-abi=hard. However, this is not sufficient to make the gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837* tests pass: they do not require arm_neon_ok, and when I tried to add it, they still failed because these lto tests do not support dg-add-options. My proposal is to add a new check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi function which tries to use neon without trying to change the -mfloat-abi setting (that is, the same as arm_neon_ok, with only "" and "-mfpu=neon" in the list of flags) . This makes these two lto tests unsupported for non-hf targets (again because gnu/stubs-soft.h is not present). To make them pass on "hf" targets: - I added -mfpu=neon to dg-lto-options in pr65837-attr_0.c, because the fpu attributes in arm_neon.h only work if -mfpu=neon is enabled - I removed dg-suppress-ld-options {-mfpu=neon} from pr65837_0.c, -mfpu=neon is needed for the test to compile with toolchains where the default fpu is not neon (eg vfpv3-d16-fp16) On arm-none-linux-gnueabihf --with-cpu=cortex-a9 --with-fpu=vfp and multilib test flag=-march=armv5t, this patch brings: - 2 UNRESOLVED -> FAIL (gcc.dg/vect/vect-align-1.c) - 14 UNRESOLVED -> XPASS (in gcc.dg/vect/) - 2765 new PASS - 3639 FAIL -> PASS - 1826 UNRESOLVED -> PASS - 102 UNRESOLVED -> XFAIL as visible in the red cell at http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/248552-gnu-stubs9.patch/report-build-info.html (the build-failed line can be ignored, it was caused by a server problem) Sorry, the explanation is almost longer than the patch :-) Is it OK for trunk? (Just realizing that I forgot to document the new functions :( ) Thanks, Christophe
2017-06-02 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache): Add flags with -mfloat-abi=hard. Include arm_neon.h. (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache): New. (check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi): New. * gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c: Require arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi. Add -mfpu=neon to dg-lto-options. * gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c: Require arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi. Remove dg-suppress-ld-options.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c index ebc5f44..f00480b 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837-attr_0.c @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ /* { dg-lto-do run } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_hw } */ -/* { dg-lto-options {{-flto}} } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi } */ +/* { dg-lto-options {{-flto -mfpu=neon}} } */ #include "arm_neon.h" diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c index 6b2def9..5d7cea7 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/lto/pr65837_0.c @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* { dg-lto-do run } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_hw } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi } */ /* { dg-lto-options {{-flto -mfpu=neon}} } */ -/* { dg-suppress-ld-options {-mfpu=neon} } */ #include "arm_neon.h" diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp index ded6383..720b10b 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp @@ -3434,8 +3434,9 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache { } { global et_arm_neon_flags set et_arm_neon_flags "" if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } { - foreach flags {"" "-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -march=armv7-a"} { + foreach flags {"" "-mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp -march=armv7-a" "-mfloat-abi=hard" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard" "-mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv7-a"} { if { [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_neon_ok object { + #include <arm_neon.h> int dummy; #ifndef __ARM_NEON__ #error not NEON @@ -3460,6 +3461,38 @@ proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok { } { check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_nocache] } +# Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mfpu=neon without any +# -mfloat-abi= option. Useful in tests where add_options is not +# supported (such as lto tests). + +proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache { } { + if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } { + foreach flags {"" "-mfpu=neon"} { + if { [check_no_compiler_messages_nocache arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi object { + #include <arm_neon.h> + int dummy; + #ifndef __ARM_NEON__ + #error not NEON + #endif + /* Avoid the case where a test adds -mfpu=neon, but the toolchain is + configured for -mcpu=arm926ej-s, for example. */ + #if __ARM_ARCH < 7 || __ARM_ARCH_PROFILE == 'M' + #error Architecture does not support NEON. + #endif + } "$flags"] } { + return 1 + } + } + } + + return 0 +} + +proc check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi { } { + return [check_cached_effective_target arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi \ + check_effective_target_arm_neon_ok_no_float_abi_nocache] +} + proc check_effective_target_arm_crc_ok_nocache { } { global et_arm_crc_flags set et_arm_crc_flags "-march=armv8-a+crc"