Hello world,
I have committed the attached patch as obvious as r248519 after testing
that it does indeed work on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and that
it passes regression-test on that machine.
Sorry for the breakage. I'll use the gcc compile farm machines
in the future to test any such changes.
Regards
Thomas
2017-05-26 Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org>
PR boostrap/80889
* acinclude.m4: Also set HAVE_AVX128 on the false
branch of LIBGFOR_CHECK_AVX128.
* configure: Regenerated.
Index: acinclude.m4
===================================================================
--- acinclude.m4 (Revision 248472)
+++ acinclude.m4 (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -499,6 +499,6 @@ AC_DEFUN([LIBGFOR_CHECK_AVX128], [
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_AVX128, 1,
[Define if -mprefer-avx128 is supported.])
AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_AVX128],true),
- [])
+ [AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_AVX128],false)])
CFLAGS="$ac_save_CFLAGS"
])
Index: configure
===================================================================
--- configure (Revision 248472)
+++ configure (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -26453,7 +26453,16 @@ else
HAVE_AVX128_FALSE=
fi
+else
+ if false; then
+ HAVE_AVX128_TRUE=
+ HAVE_AVX128_FALSE='#'
+else
+ HAVE_AVX128_TRUE='#'
+ HAVE_AVX128_FALSE=
fi
+
+fi
rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
CFLAGS="$ac_save_CFLAGS"
@@ -26714,6 +26723,10 @@ if test -z "${HAVE_AVX128_TRUE}" && test -z "${HAV
as_fn_error "conditional \"HAVE_AVX128\" was never defined.
Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally." "$LINENO" 5
fi
+if test -z "${HAVE_AVX128_TRUE}" && test -z "${HAVE_AVX128_FALSE}"; then
+ as_fn_error "conditional \"HAVE_AVX128\" was never defined.
+Usually this means the macro was only invoked conditionally." "$LINENO" 5
+fi
: ${CONFIG_STATUS=./config.status}
ac_write_fail=0
