On 05/25/2017 07:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I don't mind removing the warning again if preferred. I thought it was useful (as we already warn for ignored const in return types).
Oh yeah, I recall noticing we did that (and noting we didn't warn elsewhere). This new warning seems consistent.
I say leave it in unless the grumbling gets too much for you :) nathan -- Nathan Sidwell
