On Wed, 17 May 2017, Marek Polacek wrote: > I've always disliked using 0 where NULL_TREE should be. It's confusing to see > if (value != 0), which makes value to look like an integer, even though it may > be a tree. > > Next cleanup will probablyn be about using booleans where desirable. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? > > 2017-05-17 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> > > * c-common.c: Use NULL_TREE instead of 0 where appropriate. > * c-warn.c: Likewise. > > * c-decl.c: Use NULL_TREE instead of 0 where appropriate. > * c-typeck.c: Likewise.
OK. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
