On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 18:03 -0700, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool > <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:36:26PM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 14:15 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> > Hi! > >> > > >> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:53:33AM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote: > >> > > Add handling for early expansion of vector locical operations in > >> > > gimple. > >> > > Specifically: vec_and, vec_andc, vec_or, vec_xor, vec_orc, vec_nand. > >> > > >> > You also handle nor (except in the changelog). But what about eqv? > >> > >> Right, in my excitement I lost my 'vec_nor', that one should be > >> mentioned as well. > >> > >> vec_eqv() I have as a later patch in my series, it will be showing up > >> once this first bunch are in. > > > > Ah cool -- fine with the changelog fix then. Thanks! > > Will, > > All of the testcases are failing on AIX. Most are direct fails, but > some are complaining about implicit declaration of a function. > > I thought that we had determined the correct gcc testsuite target > selectors. Something is not correct with the new tests. > > The errors about undeclared function are: > > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-div-float.c (test for excess errors) > > Excess errors: > > /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-div-float.c: > > 13:10: warning: implicit declaration of function 'vec_div'; did you > mean 'vec_dss'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-div-float.c: > 13:3: error: AltiVec argument passed to unprototyped function > > and > > FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-div-floatdouble.c (test for excess errors) > > Excess errors: > > /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-div-floatdouble.c:10:8: > error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before > 'double' > > Would you please look into this and fix it?
Yes. I've started a checkout on gcc119. Is that the right environment I should poke around in, or is there a preferred or recommended alternative? Thanks, -Will > > Thanks, David >
