On 9 May 2017 at 16:12, Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> wrote: > On Tue, 9 May 2017, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > >> Tested on Linux-x64, not tested with the full suite yet. >> >> 2017-05-09 Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> >> >> gcc/ >> >> PR c++/80682 >> * cp/method.c (is_trivially_xible): Reject void types. >> >> testsuite/ >> >> PR c++/80682 >> * g++.dg/ext/is_trivially_constructible1.C: Add tests for void target. > > > What happens for "const void" and other variants?
They don't work. New patch attached.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/method.c b/gcc/cp/method.c index b4c1f60..9b17ef1 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/method.c +++ b/gcc/cp/method.c @@ -1207,6 +1207,8 @@ constructible_expr (tree to, tree from) bool is_trivially_xible (enum tree_code code, tree to, tree from) { + if (cv_unqualified (to) == void_type_node) + return false; tree expr; if (code == MODIFY_EXPR) expr = assignable_expr (to, from); diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/is_trivially_constructible1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/is_trivially_constructible1.C index a5bac7b..175eae9 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/is_trivially_constructible1.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/is_trivially_constructible1.C @@ -27,10 +27,18 @@ SA(!__is_trivially_constructible(C,C&)); SA(__is_trivially_assignable(C,C&)); SA(!__is_trivially_assignable(C,C)); SA(!__is_trivially_assignable(C,C&&)); +SA(!__is_trivially_assignable(void,int)); +SA(!__is_trivially_assignable(const void,int)); +SA(!__is_trivially_assignable(volatile void,int)); +SA(!__is_trivially_assignable(const volatile void,int)); SA(__is_trivially_constructible(int,int)); SA(__is_trivially_constructible(int,double)); SA(!__is_trivially_constructible(int,B)); +SA(!__is_trivially_constructible(void,int)); +SA(!__is_trivially_constructible(const void,int)); +SA(!__is_trivially_constructible(volatile void,int)); +SA(!__is_trivially_constructible(const volatile void,int)); SA(!__is_trivially_constructible(D));