On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 01:16:05PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:51:30PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:46:44PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >> Possibly, but for GCC 8.
> > > > >
> > > > > To both this switchconv patch and the potential improvement for
> > > > > loading
> > > > > from const arrays (can create an enhancement PR for that), or just the
> > > > > latter?
> > > >
> > > > Both I think - the patch is pretty big.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll queue the patch for GCC8 then.
> >
> > If the tree-vrp.c change makes it in, is this patch ok for trunk too now
> > that we are in stage1? Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
> > i686-linux on top of the tree-vrp.c change (without the tree-vrp.c change
> > vrp40.c regresses).
>
> Ok.
So with XFAILing vrp40.c for now until the constant load opt is resolved?
Jakub
