On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >>>> On 01.05.17 at 11:09, <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >>> While either of the last two operands can be in memory, they can't be >>> swapped. >>> >>> gcc/ >>> 2017-04-28 Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >>> >>> * config/i386/sse.md (xop_vpermil2<mode>3): Use alternatives. >> >> Please write a more descriptive ChangeLog entry, e.g. "Do not allow >> operand swapping, add (x,x,m,x,n) alternative. >> >> OK with above change for mainline and release branches. > > Considering the most recent status announcement I understand > that I should not apply this to branches/gcc-7-branch until after > 7.1 went out. Please correct me if that's wrong.
Yes, release rules still apply, so please wait until gcc-7 branch is opened again. > I'm also not sure whether with your reply you also meant to > cover branches/gcc-6-branch (and possibly even older, albeit > personally I don't care about 5.x anymore). Your call, if you think the patch should be applied to older branches. Otherwise, branches survived without the patch until now, so I guess it is not that critical. Uros.
