Richard, I got a patch for PR50527.
The patch prevents the alignment of vla-related allocas to be set to BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in ccp. The alignment may turn out smaller after folding the alloca. Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64. OK for trunk? Thanks, - Tom 2011-09-27 Tom de Vries <t...@codesourcery.com> * tree-ssa-ccp.c (evaluate_stmt): Don't assume alignment for vla-related allocas. * gcc.dg/pr50527.c: New test.
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c =================================================================== --- gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c (revision 179210) +++ gcc/tree-ssa-ccp.c (working copy) @@ -1632,6 +1632,8 @@ evaluate_stmt (gimple stmt) break; case BUILT_IN_ALLOCA: + if (gimple_call_alloca_for_var_p (stmt)) + break; val.lattice_val = CONSTANT; val.value = build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (gimple_get_lhs (stmt)), 0); val.mask = shwi_to_double_int Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr50527.c =================================================================== --- /dev/null (new file) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr50527.c (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +/* { dg-do run } */ +/* { dg-options "-Os --param large-stack-frame=30" } */ + +extern void abort (void); + +void __attribute__((noinline)) +bar (char *a) +{ +} + +void __attribute__((noinline)) +foo (char *a, int b) +{ +} + +void __attribute__((noinline)) +test_align (char *p, int aligned, unsigned int mask) +{ + int p_aligned = ((unsigned long int)p & mask) == 0; + if (aligned != p_aligned) + abort (); +} + +int +main () +{ + const int kIterations = 4; + char results[kIterations]; + int i; + unsigned int mask; + + mask = 0xf; + test_align (results, ((unsigned long int)results & mask) == 0, mask); + mask = 0x7; + test_align (results, ((unsigned long int)results & mask) == 0, mask); + mask = 0x3; + test_align (results, ((unsigned long int)results & mask) == 0, mask); + mask = 0x1; + test_align (results, ((unsigned long int)results & mask) == 0, mask); + + bar (results); + for (i = 0; i < kIterations; i++) + foo ("%d ", results[i]); + + return 0; +}