On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >>> +/* X / 4 < Y / 4 iif X < Y when the division is known to be exact. */ >> >> >> s/iif/iff/ ? > > > Indeed, thanks, I've fixed it locally.
Ok. As of strict-overflow warnings I'd like to kill -f[no-]strict-overflow by aliasing it to -f[no-]wrapv and thus removing the !TYPE_OVERFLOW_WRAPS && !TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED && !TYPE_OVERFLOW_TRAPS case. This means effectively killing -Wstrict-overflow which is IMHO reasonable as it's quite broken plus we now have ubsan which does a better job. Thanks, Richard. > -- > Marc Glisse
