On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 02:08:49PM +0100, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> Thanks for testing it. Could you have a check if updated patch >> resolves the ICE? >> As for sms-*.c tests, I had difficulty in reproducing it. Both trunk >> and patched GCC have the same behavior with my local ppc cross >> toolchain, sms-1.c fails and sms-4.c succeeds. > > I backed out the original patch #33, and replaced it with the one you sent me, > and it does allow dealII to be built. I rebuilt all 30 benchmarks in Spec > 2006, and now they all build. > > I ran a full spec 2006 suite on a little endian power8 that we normally use to > run Spec. Note, I use different options to build spec that the people that do > the official runs, so the results are in no way official results. I'm only > providing the differences, and not the spec numbers. > Thanks very much for testing.
> Generally, I consider differences between runs that were less than 2% to be in > the noise level. There were only two benchmarks that had differences more > than > 2%: > > * 456.hmmer had an 8% regression I will have a look. > * 434.zeusmp had a 3% speedup. This one is expected, also saw this on other targets. Thanks, bin > > In terms of smaller differences, the following had 1% differences: > > * 410.bwaves had a 1% regression > * 459.GemsFDTD had a 1% regression > * 437.leslie3d had a 1% speedup > * 453.povray had a 1.6% speedup > > -- > Michael Meissner, IBM > IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA > email: meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
