On 03/31/2017 07:50 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
Hi,
I''ve sent this patch once
(<https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg01261.html>).
But I haven't got any response. I'd like to resend it instead of pinging, and
explain it more.
There's a couple things going on here. Cilk+ does not currently have a
maintainer, thus review of Cilk+ changes can easily fall through the
cracks. Additionally, the plan is deprecate Cilk+ in gcc-7, so it's
very very low on our priority list.
With the likely deprecation in mind, I've only done a cursory review of
the changes -- mostly to verify that they hit Cilk+ paths only.
What's the purpose behind changing when we set the in_lto_p flag?
Jeff
