On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Bill Schmidt
<wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 4/5/17 9:14 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the patch! Looks like there are some compile problems. I
>>> can fix "resut", but not sure what the intent is for "canonical":
>>
>> I'm a dumbass. I built the x86_64 compiler :(
>> try this.
>>
>> nathan
> Thanks! Regtest showed that this blows up on the gcc_assert for Fortran
> and Go. If I change the assert to an explicit test, everything is
> fine. Corrected patch attached; needs a change log ofc.
Ick.
As said, why not do
+static tree
+rs6000_vt (const char *name, tree elt_type, unsigned num_elts)
+{
+ tree result = build_vector_type (elt_type, num_elts);
+ tree orig_name = TYPE_NAME (result);
+
+ /* Tell set_underlying_type to create a clone. */
+ TYPE_NAME (result) = error_mark_node;
result = build_variant_type_copy (result);
+ tree named_type = add_builtin_type (name, result);
+ TYPE_NAME (result) = orig_name;
+
+ if (named_type && TREE_TYPE (named_type) != result)
+ {
+ result = TREE_TYPE (named_type);
+ TREE_USED (result) = true;
why's this needed?
+ }
I don't like that error_mark_node hack at all.
Richard.
> Bill
