Hi, this patch fixes the vcond shift testcase that failed since setting PARAM_MIN_VECT_LOOP_BOUND in the s390 backend.
Regards Robin -- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2017-03-27 Robin Dapp <rd...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> * gcc.target/s390/vector/vcond-shift.c (void foo): Increase iteration count and assume alignment. (void foo2): Likewise. (void foo3): Likewise. (int baz): Likewise. (int baf): Likewise. (int bal): Likewise.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/vector/vcond-shift.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/vector/vcond-shift.c index f58bd1f..cc40153 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/vector/vcond-shift.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/vector/vcond-shift.c @@ -11,51 +11,63 @@ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "vesrlh\t%v.?,%v.?,15" } } */ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "vesrlb\t%v.?,%v.?,7" } } */ -#define SZ 4 -#define SZ2 8 -#define SZ3 16 +#define SZ 8 +#define SZ2 16 +#define SZ3 32 void foo(int *w) { int i; - /* Should expand to (w + (w < 0 ? 1 : 0)) >> 1 - which in turn should get simplified to (w + (w >> 31)) >> 1. */ + int *ww = __builtin_assume_aligned (w, 8); + + /* Should expand to (ww + (ww < 0 ? 1 : 0)) >> 1 + which in turn should get simplified to (ww + (ww >> 31)) >> 1. */ for (i = 0; i < SZ; i++) - w[i] = w[i] / 2; + ww[i] = ww[i] / 2; } void foo2(short *w) { int i; + short *ww = __builtin_assume_aligned (w, 8); + for (i = 0; i < SZ2; i++) - w[i] = w[i] / 2; + ww[i] = ww[i] / 2; } void foo3(signed char *w) { int i; + signed char *ww = __builtin_assume_aligned (w, 8); + for (i = 0; i < SZ3; i++) - w[i] = w[i] / 2; + ww[i] = ww[i] / 2; } int baz(int *x) { int i; + int *xx = __builtin_assume_aligned (x, 8); + for (i = 0; i < SZ; i++) - x[i] = x[i] < 0 ? -1 : 0; + xx[i] = xx[i] < 0 ? -1 : 0; } int baf(short *x) { int i; + short *xx = __builtin_assume_aligned (x, 8); + for (i = 0; i < SZ2; i++) - x[i] = x[i] >= 0 ? 0 : 1; + xx[i] = xx[i] >= 0 ? 0 : 1; } int bal(signed char *x) { int i; + signed char *xx = __builtin_assume_aligned (x, 8); + for (i = 0; i < SZ3; i++) - x[i] = x[i] >= 0 ? 0 : -1; + xx[i] = xx[i] >= 0 ? 0 : -1; }