Re: [wwwdocs] Remove "New in GCC 3.4.0" from bugs/index.html

[Richard Biener]

On March 19, 2017 8:53:16 AM GMT+01:00, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> 
wrote:
>GCC 3.4.0 dates back to 2004, and by now everyone really should 
>have updated their stuff to newer G++ / C++ standards. ;-)

Maybe this place is a good one to refer to the various porting_to.HTML pages we 
have that list similar issues?

Richard.

>Committed.
>
>Gerald
>
>Index: bugs/index.html
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/bugs/index.html,v
>retrieving revision 1.118
>diff -u -r1.118 index.html
>--- bugs/index.html    21 Nov 2015 15:41:17 -0000      1.118
>+++ bugs/index.html    19 Mar 2017 07:49:15 -0000
>@@ -697,78 +697,7 @@
>However, some non-conforming constructs are allowed when the
>command-line
> option <code>-fpermissive</code> is used.</p>
> 
>-<h4><a name="new34">New in GCC 3.4.0</a></h4>
>-
>-<p>The new parser brings a lot of improvements, especially concerning
>-name-lookup.</p>
>-
>-<ul>
>-
>-<li>The "implicit typename" extension got removed (it was already
>deprecated
>-since GCC 3.1), so that the following code is now rejected, see
>[14.6]:
>-<blockquote><pre>
>-template &lt;typename&gt; struct A
>-{
>-    typedef int X;
>-};
>-
>-template &lt;typename T&gt; struct B
>-{
>-    A&lt;T&gt;::X          x;  // error
>-    typename A&lt;T&gt;::X y;  // OK
>-};
>-
>-B&lt;void&gt; b;
>-</pre></blockquote></li>
>-
>-<li>For similar reasons, the following code now requires the
>-<code>template</code> keyword, see [14.2]:
>-<blockquote><pre>
>-template &lt;typename&gt; struct A
>-{
>-    template &lt;int&gt; struct X {};
>-};
>-
>-template &lt;typename T&gt; struct B
>-{
>-    typename A&lt;T&gt;::X&lt;0&gt;          x;  // error
>-    typename A&lt;T&gt;::template X&lt;0&gt; y;  // OK
>-};
>-
>-B&lt;void&gt; b;
>-</pre></blockquote></li>
>-
>-<li>We now have two-stage name-lookup, so that the following code is
>-rejected, see [14.6]/9:
>-<blockquote><pre>
>-template &lt;typename T&gt; int foo()
>-{
>-    return i;  // error
>-}
>-</pre></blockquote></li>
>-
>-<li>This also affects members of base classes, see [14.6.2]:
>-<blockquote><pre>
>-template &lt;typename&gt; struct A
>-{
>-    int i, j;
>-};
>-
>-template &lt;typename T&gt; struct B : A&lt;T&gt;
>-{
>-    int foo1() { return i; }       // error
>-    int foo2() { return this-&gt;i; } // OK
>-    int foo3() { return B&lt;T&gt;::i; } // OK
>-    int foo4() { return A&lt;T&gt;::i; } // OK
>-
>-    using A&lt;T&gt;::j;
>-    int foo5() { return j; }       // OK
>-};
>-</pre></blockquote></li>
>-
>-</ul>
>-
>-<p>In addition to the problems listed above, the manual contains a
>section on
>+<p>The manual contains a section on
><a
>href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Misunderstandings.html";>
> Common Misunderstandings with GNU C++</a>.</p>
>