It was XFAILed because there was a bug in glibc, but that bug was fixed
nine years ago.  Nowadays everyone uses a version of glibc with the bug
fixed, so we should no longer XFAIL the test.

This fixes it.  Testing on powerpc64-linux {-m32,-m64}, will commit if
that succeeds.


Segher


2017-03-15  Segher Boessenkool  <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>

gcc/testsuite/
        PR fortran/33271
        * gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90: Do not xfail powerpc*-*-linux*.

---
 gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90
index 0727136..be195e7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90
@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
 ! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00139.html
 !
 ! { dg-do run }
-! { dg-xfail-run-if "PR 33271, math library bug" { powerpc-ibm-aix* 
powerpc-*-linux* powerpc64-*-linux* *-*-mingw* } { "-O0" } { "" } }
-! Note that this doesn't fail on powerpc64le-*-linux*.
+! { dg-xfail-run-if "PR 33271, math library bug" { powerpc-ibm-aix* *-*-mingw* 
} { "-O0" } { "" } }
   real(kind=8) :: a
   integer(kind=8) :: i1, i2
   real :: b
-- 
1.9.3

Reply via email to