On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Janne Blomqvist
<blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 7:26 PM, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:15 AM, Janne Blomqvist
>> <blomqvist.ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Don't try to use rand_s on CYGWIN
>>>
>>> CYGWIN seems to include _mingw.h and thus __MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR is
>>> defined even though rand_s is not available. Thus add an extra check
>>> for __CYGWIN__.
>>>
>>> Thanks to Tim Prince and Nightstrike for bringing this issue to my 
>>> attention.
>>>
>>> Committed as r245755.
>>>
>>> 2017-02-27  Janne Blomqvist  <j...@gcc.gnu.org>
>>>
>>>     * intrinsics/random.c (getosrandom): Don't try to use rand_s on
>>>     CYGWIN.
>>
>> 1) There was no patch attached to the email.
>
> Oh, sorry. Well, you can see it at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=245755
>
>> 2) As mentioned on IRC, I don't think this is the right fix.  The real
>> problem is that time_1.h includes windows.h on CYGWIN, which it
>> shouldn't be doing.  This then pollutes the translation unit with all
>> sorts of MINGW-isms that aren't exactly appropriate for cygwin.
>> Removing the include in time_1.h and then adjusting a few ifdefs in
>> system_clock.c that also had the same bug fixes the problem.  The
>> testsuite is running right now on this.
>
> It used to be something like that, but IIRC there were some complaints
> about SYSTEM_CLOCK on cygwin that were due to the cygwin
> clock_gettime() or something like that, and after some discussion with
> someone who knows something about cygwin/mingw (since you apparently
> have no memory of it, I guess it was Kai), it was decided to use
> GetTickCount & QPC also on cygwin.

I searched a bit, and it seems the culprit is the thread starting at

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00033.html

So it turned out that clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ...) always
returned 0 on cygwin, hence the code was changed to use the windows
API functions GetTickCount and QPC also on cygwin at

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00124.html

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919

-- 
Janne Blomqvist

Reply via email to