On 03/03/17 10:47 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
This patch caused a new regression on AIX.

I'm unable to bootstrap on either gcc111 or gcc119 so I can't test
the fix.


- David

FAIL: 17_intro/names.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:600: error: expected
unqualified-id before '[' token
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:600: error: expected ')' before '[' token
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:668: error: expected
unqualified-id before '[' token
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/sys/types.h:668: error: expected ')' before '[' token
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:332: error: 'parameter' declared
as function returning a function
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/stdlib.h:332: error: expected
primary-expression before 'void'
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/math.h:1458: error: expected unqualified-id
before ',' token
/tmp/GCC/gcc/include-fixed/math.h:1458: error: expected ')' before ',' token

AIX types.h:600 is

typedef struct { int r[1]; } *  physadr_t;

stdlib.h:332 is

       extern int      at_quick_exit(void (*f)(void));

math.h:1458 is

    struct dbl_hypot {
        double x, y;
    };

Reply via email to