On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:

> Hi,
> For the following test-case:
> 
> int __GIMPLE () foo (int a)
> {
>   return t0_1(D);
> }
> 
> The compiler emits the undeclared diagnostic and then ICE's in
> c_parser_gimple_postfix_expression because we don't check if
> c_parser_parse_ssa_name returned error_mark_node.
> ICE: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/45a01338d80faf4f21330bc9ee97ca5f
> 
> For this test-case:
> int __GIMPLE() foo(int a)
> {
>   int _1;
>   return _1(D);
> }
> 
> c_parser_gimple_postfix_expression calls set_ssa_default_def which
> crashes with segfault
> because SSA_VAR_P(_1) is NULL and set_ssa_default_def expects it to be 
> non-null.
> ICE: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/1df5a4e8a59eca289e214bbaf07a461a
> 
> The patch rejects the above test-case with:
> foo.c: In function ‘foo’:
> foo.c:4:10: error: anonymous SSA name cannot have default definition
>    return _1(D);
> 
> OK to commit after bootstrap+test ?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

Reply via email to