Hi Richard!
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:19:21 +0100 (CET), Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
wrote:
> PR tree-optimization/78218
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr78218.c (revision 0)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr78218.c (working copy)
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* { dg-do run } */
> +
> +struct
> +{
> + int v;
> +} a[2];
> +
> +int b;
> +
> +void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
> +check ()
Is it itentional that here, check doesn't specify any formal parameters,
but...
> +{
> + if (a[0].v != 1)
> + __builtin_abort ();
> +}
> +
> +int main ()
> +{
> + a[1].v = 1;
> + a[0] = a[1];
> + a[1].v = 0;
> + check (a);
... here it is called, passing in "a"? (PTX doesn't like such
mismatches.)
> + return 0;
> +}
OK to commit the obvious patch to change the call site? (Not yet
tested.)
- check (a);
+ check ();
Grüße
Thomas
