On February 11, 2017 12:38:32 AM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:34:30PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >> > 2017-02-10 Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> >> > >> > config/ >> > * isl.m4: Remove support for ISL 0.14. >> > >> > * configure: Re-generate. >> > >> > gcc/ >> > * configure.ac (HAVE_ISL_OPTIONS_SET_SCHEDULE_SERIALIZE_SCCS): >> > Remove. >> > * configure: Re-generate. >> > * config.in: Likewise. >> > * graphite-dependences.c: Simplify as if >> > HAVE_ISL_OPTIONS_SET_SCHEDULE_SERIALIZE_SCCS was defined. >> > * graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c: Likewise. >> > * graphite-optimize-isl.c: Likewise. >> > * graphite-poly.c: Likewise. >> > * graphite-sese-to-poly.c: Likewise. >> > * graphite.h: Likewise. >> > * toplev.c: Include isl/version.h and use isl_version () for >> > printing the ISL version. >> > * doc/install.texi: Update ISL requirement. >> My concern here would be that distributions may still be shipping >isl-0.14. >> Fedora 25 (for example) still uses iso-0.14. > >isl isn't a mandatory requirement for building gcc, worst case you just >don't have graphite support. Fedora 26 already has isl-0.16.1.
Yeah. Note that even with ISL 0.15 there are known bugs. I just hope that w/o the legacy code maintainance would be easier. Richard. > Jakub
