On 02/08/2017 09:33 AM, Tim Song wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
'potentially constructed subobject' appears to be a term without definition.
[special]/5:
For a class, its non-static data members, its non-virtual direct base
classes, and, if the class is not abstract, its virtual base classes
are called its potentially constructed subobjects.
thanks. That suggests that this, pedantically, is not a defect. It's
certainly an unwelcome surprise though.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
