Hi Palmer, On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > These were suggested as part of our review process, but I never got an > OK on them. Am I meant to just commit these?
I am pretty sure I acked htdocs/readings.html (see the mail below). backends.html I am not sufficiently knowledgable, but since we trust you to maintain the port, it makes sense to trust you to describe the port's characteristics, too. ;-) So, both are okay. Thanks, Gerald ======== forwarded message ======== From: Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> To: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@dabbelt.com> Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 22:55:05 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: New Port for RISC-V v2 On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > How do these look? Fine for readings.html. backends.html, not my cup of tea. ;-) Gerald
