On 02/03/2017 01:52 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
IIRC you had another issue that was borderline,
but which we did want to move forward on gcc-7. The reported
testcase
was a problem with a new warning, but the underlying issue could (in
theory) be tripped for existing warnings. RIght?
I think you're talking about PR preprocessor/79210. I found a trivial
way to turn the reproducer for that one into one that ICE-d gcc 7 with
input that gcc 6 could handle, so I marked it as "[7 Regression]",
committed a fix to trunk, and marked it as RESOLVED FIXED.
That's the one :-) Perfect. Thanks.
jeff
