On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 13:58 +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > The other failures I saw didn't seem atomics related > > (eg, openacc) > > I suppose you're testing without nvptx offloading -- which failures do > you see for OpenACC testing? (There shouldn't be any for host fallback > testing.)
Sorry, false alarm. Those tests print out "FAILED", but they don't actually fail. > > I haven't compared it against a full bootstrap build and > > make check of trunk.). > > I just happened to do that for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, and I'm seeing the > following additional changes; posting this just in case that's not > expected to happen: > > -PASS: gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-5.c (test for excess errors) > -PASS: gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-5.c execution test > +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-5.c Those changes are expected because we don't expect anymore that cmpxchg16b availability also means that 16-byte atomics will be inlined.
